<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>So, this is what I&#039;m thinking...&#187; Brian Hoover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/tag/politics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog</link>
	<description>Brian Hoover&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:27:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>10 Geeky laws that should exist, but don&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/personal/10-geeky-laws-exist</link>
		<comments>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/personal/10-geeky-laws-exist#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/?p=2157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many, many laws having nothing to do with government that are useful to know because they tell you something about how the universe works. There are Newton’s laws of motion, the laws of thermodynamics, Boyle’s Law, Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, among many. Most of these laws have been known for a long time, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste"><a rel="attachment wp-att-2158" href="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/personal/10-geeky-laws-exist/attachment/geekshirt06"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2158" title="Geeks are for life" src="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/geekshirt06-150x150.jpg" alt="Geeks are for life" width="150" height="150" /></a>There are many, many laws having nothing to do with government that are useful to know because they tell you something about how the universe works. There are <a class="zem_slink" title="Newton's laws of motion" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_laws_of_motion">Newton’s laws of motion</a>, the <a class="zem_slink" title="Laws of thermodynamics" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_thermodynamics">laws of thermodynamics</a>, <a class="zem_slink" title="Boyle's law" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boyle%27s_law">Boyle’s Law</a>, Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, among many. Most of these laws have been known for a long time, but it wasn’t until a mere 19 years ago that <a class="zem_slink" title="Godwin's law" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law">Godwin’s Law</a> was written.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">If you’ve ever been involved in a discussion on Usenet, or have been following politics in the past decade or so, you’ve probably encountered Godwin’s Law. While Godwin’s Law is, alas, as true today as it was then, it seems unfortunate that there aren’t more widely accepted axioms to help us geeks define the characteristics of our world.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">To that end, then, here are 10 geeky laws (axioms) that should exist, but don’t … at least, they didn’t until now:</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">
<ol>
<li>Munroe’s Law: A person in a geeky argument who can quote xkcd to support his position automatically wins the argument. This law supersedes Godwin, so that even if the quote is about Hitler, the quoter still wins.</li>
<li>Lucas’s Law: There is no movie so beloved that a “special edition,” prequel or sequel cannot trample and forever stain its memory.</li>
<li>Tolkien and Rowling’s Law: No reasonably faithful movie adaptation of a book will ever be quite as good as the book it adapts. Thus great movie adaptations can only be made out of truly amazing books.</li>
<li>Somers and McCarthy’s Law: There is no dangerous unscientific theory so preposterous that no celebrity will espouse and advocate it.</li>
<li>Jobs’s Law: No matter how well last year’s cool tech gadget still works, it will seem utterly inadequate the moment the new version comes out.</li>
<li>Savage and Hyneman’s Law: Blowing stuff up is fun. Blowing stuff up in the name of science is AWESOME.</li>
<li>Starbucks’ and Peet’s Law: C8H10N4O2, better known as caffeine, is the most wonderful chemical compound known to humankind. If the field of chemistry had never identified or produced a single other useful compound, caffeine alone would be justification enough for its existence.</li>
<li>Wilbur’s Law: Bacon makes everything better.</li>
<li>Comic Book Guy’s Law: There is no detail of a movie too brief or inconsequential to become the subject of an hours-long diatribe.</li>
<li>The Unified Geek Theory: At present, the President of the United States, the wealthiest person in the United States, and the most trusted newscaster in the United States are all geeks. At the same time, movies based on comic book characters are routinely taking in hundreds of millions of dollars. The only reasonable conclusion is: We’ve won!</li>
</ol>
</div>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/11/10-geeky-laws-that-should-exist-but-dont/">Geek Dad</a></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=a79d9df0-ed2f-4435-929f-7ab579f3519c" alt="" /><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/personal/10-geeky-laws-exist/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has the world gone mad?</title>
		<link>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/personal/world-mad</link>
		<comments>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/personal/world-mad#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 02:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/?p=2031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only have reigning World Cup Champions Italy been bundled out in the Group Matches along with powerhouses France (neither of who won a game), but USA came out on top in their group! That&#8217;s unpossible.
And to top it all off we now have a new female Prime Minister. OK, I get it&#8230; I didn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/28257_546379027081_219001952_32743542_650091_n.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2030" title="Rudd no friends named Julia" src="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/28257_546379027081_219001952_32743542_650091_n-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Not only have reigning <a class="zem_slink" title="FIFA World Cup" rel="homepage" href="http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/">World Cup</a> Champions <a title="Azzuri" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italy_national_football_team">Italy</a> been bundled out in the Group Matches along with powerhouses <a title="Les Bleus" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France_national_football_team">France</a> (neither of who won a game), but <a title="The Yanks" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_men's_national_soccer_team">USA</a> came out on top in their group! That&#8217;s unpossible.</p>
<p>And to top it all off we now have a new <em>female</em> Prime Minister. OK, I get it&#8230; I didn&#8217;t vote for her and all that but our <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_government">system of Government</a> is one where we vote for our local member who votes for the PM on our behalf. But still, it&#8217;d be good to at least have a say. The Facebook hate groups have already started up including <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Hows-Julia-Gillard-going-to-run-the-country-from-the-kitchen/127572377282821?ref=search">How&#8217;s Julia Gillard going to run the country from the kitchen?</a>, plus <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/I-hate-it-when-I-wake-up-and-Julia-Gillard-is-Prime-Minister/133033123391522?ref=search">I hate it when I wake up and Julia Gillard is Prime Minister</a> and the more humourous <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Julia-Gillards-first-move-as-Prime-Minister-Equal-Rights-For-Rangas/138237192856301?ref=search">Julia Gillard&#8217;s first move as Prime Minister: Equal Rights For Rangas</a>.</p>
<p>If she&#8217;s just do something with Conroy, the Minister for Broadband who can&#8217;t work an iPhone, I might feel a little more secure.</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://r.zemanta.com/?u=http%3A//www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/06/24/gillard.profile/index.html&amp;a=19894289&amp;rid=8e5f8125-4896-4812-be30-76cf1330797c&amp;e=841c635afee8e3819e28edf9ccba6595">Julia Gillard: From union official to Australian prime minister</a> (cnn.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://r.zemanta.com/?u=http%3A//www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/7850711/Kevin-Rudd-dumped-as-Julia-Gillard-becomes-Australian-prime-minister.html&amp;a=19882099&amp;rid=8e5f8125-4896-4812-be30-76cf1330797c&amp;e=049563cc5075417af51ef659d6e9905e">Kevin Rudd dumped as Julia Gillard becomes Australian prime minister</a> (telegraph.co.uk)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2010/06/24/julia-gillard-steps-over-the-corpse-of-kevin-rudd/">Julia Gillard Steps Over The Corpse Of Kevin Rudd</a> (loadofbullshit.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/24/italy-finished-slovakia-e_n_624128.html">Italy FINISHED: Slovakia Eliminates Defending World Cup Champions</a> (huffingtonpost.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://r.zemanta.com/?u=http%3A//www.cnn.com/2010/SPORT/football/06/24/italy.slovakia.new.zealand.paraguay/index.html&amp;a=19914692&amp;rid=8e5f8125-4896-4812-be30-76cf1330797c&amp;e=7b2052c35c97f85e0befc8bd7d57ba2f">Champions Italy crash out of World Cup</a> (cnn.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=8e5f8125-4896-4812-be30-76cf1330797c" alt="" /><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/personal/world-mad/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BP: screw you, America</title>
		<link>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/bp-screw-america</link>
		<comments>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/bp-screw-america#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 08:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/?p=1939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BP should't worry about it's image with PR consultants and advertising agencies making love to dolphins in rain forests. It's not going to work. They should just hire armies of lawyers to fight every claim against them and protect their shareholders. BP can easily do business with the rest of the world]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-1940" href="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/bp-screw-america/attachment/spill-thumb-504x444-41023"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1940" title="Gulf of Mexico Oil spill" src="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/spill-thumb-504x444-41023-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Yeah, so BP has little chance of ever doing business in America again on any large scale. All the PR spin and hand wringing  in the world isn&#8217;t going to salvage anything out of the current mess so they should probably cut their losses and fire a few parting shots across the bows before burning all their bridges and pulling out for good.</p>
<p>BP should tell the American hypocrites to DIAF. Sure, the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is one of the largest man-made disasters in recent years, but America is the largest consumer of oil in the world, with an insatiable demand. And yet they&#8217;re refused to do anything about global climate change of which their use of oil is a direct result, and is an ongoing man-made disaster. To keep up with the demand, the oil companies need to drill in ever more dangerous and sensitive places. There are consequences to be addicted to cheap oil. This is one of them.</p>
<p>BP should&#8217;t worry about it&#8217;s image by hiring PR consultants and advertising agencies to dream up ads about making love to dolphins in rain forests. It&#8217;s not going to work. They should just hire armies of lawyers to doggedly fight every claim against them and protect their shareholders. BP can easily do business with the rest of the world.</p>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/bp-screw-america/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My first Federal Budget</title>
		<link>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/federal-budget</link>
		<comments>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/federal-budget#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/?p=1746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can be glad it's a game, and glad that I am not in charge of the Australian economy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look <a href="http://www.news.com.au/business/federal-budget/2010/instabudget?id=2107">here</a> to see my first Australian Federal Budget. In a nutshell I have:</p>
<ul>
<li>set a flat tax rate of 25%, as opposed to a graduated tax rate. I could probably have raised company tax to 30% though.</li>
<li>decreased welfare spending to about 2/3rds of last year</li>
<li>delivered a $5B budget surplus as opposed to a $6B deficit</li>
</ul>
<p>Would this work? Who knows. We can be glad it&#8217;s a game, and glad that I am not in charge of the Australian economy.</p>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/federal-budget/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Earth Hour, North Korean style</title>
		<link>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/earth-hour-north-korean-style</link>
		<comments>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/earth-hour-north-korean-style#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 05:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/?p=1570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earth Hour was a great success, with a 0.000000001% reduction in emissions sustained for almost a whole hour, but a 25% increase in smugness which can still be measured days later.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-1571" href="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/earth-hour-north-korean-style/attachment/n-v-s-korea"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1571" title="Earth Hour in North Korea was a great success" src="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/N-v-S-Korea-150x150.jpg" alt="Earth Hour is a stupid scam" width="150" height="150" /></a>Hey, whoever the North Korean promoters of <a href="http://www.earthhour.org/">Earth Hour</a> were last week they deserve a medal. It seems they convinced the whole North Korean population to turn off every single light in the entire country. The <a href="http://thedearleader.com/">Dear Leader</a> is, of course, above all that so the single source of light you see is probably his, which is understandable. But &#8220;bravo!&#8221; to the rest of my North Korean comrades for loving and respecting the Earth, at least for an hour. And congratulations to the rest of the world! Earth Hour was a great success, with a 0.000000001% reduction in emissions sustained for almost a whole hour, but a 25% increase in smugness which can still be measured days later.</p>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/earth-hour-north-korean-style/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Warming: I&#8217;m not listening</title>
		<link>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/personal/global-warming-listening</link>
		<comments>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/personal/global-warming-listening#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/?p=1267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing pisses me off more (well, ok, lots of things piss me off more&#8230; I&#8217;m easily pissed off. But for the sake of agument let&#8217;s go with this) than people who either seriously or jokingly say &#8220;So much for Global Warming, it&#8217;s so cold outside today!&#8221;
Listen up and I&#8217;ll explain:
Increases in the amount of greenhouse gases [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/globalwarming.gif"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1266" title="Global Warming: I'm not listening" src="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/globalwarming-150x150.gif" alt="Global Warming: I'm not listening" width="150" height="150" /></a>Nothing pisses me off more (well, ok, lots of things piss me off more&#8230; I&#8217;m easily pissed off. But for the sake of agument let&#8217;s go with this) than people who either seriously or jokingly say &#8220;So much for Global Warming, it&#8217;s so <em>cold </em>outside today!&#8221;</p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Listen up and I&#8217;ll explain:</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Increases in the amount of greenhouse gases make the world warmer. They are called greenhouse gases because they trap heat, being transparent to sunlight coming into the atmosphere, and opaque to various wavelengths of infrared radiation emitted by matter warmed by the sunlight.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">The atmosphere becomes more energetic, and thus more active. Heated objects expand, so does heated air and water and land.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Now, there is a temperature gradient from the equator to the poles because of the angle at which the sun&#8217;s rays strike the Earth.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">The Southern hemisphere has more water and a continent at its pole. The Northern hemisphere has most of the world&#8217;s land, and a small ocean at its pole.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Thus the two hemispheres heat unevenly. The Northern hemisphere heats faster because it has more land and because that&#8217;s where most of the human-caused emissions occur&#8211;it&#8217;s like dumping feathers&#8211;they spread out eventually, carried by the wind or water, but first they pile up.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">The continent of Antarctica is surrounded by a circular current of water and a circular current of air that helps to keep it cold, even as the southern hemisphere warms. It is also very high. It is the highest continent. Much of it is more than two or three miles high&#8211;because of all that ice.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Antarctica is a very conservative mass. Since it takes vastly more energy to melt ice than to warm air or water, it is taking a very long time to warm the high plateau of East Anarctica.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">At the other pole, however, the ice is floating on water for the most part. Heat dumped down the temperature gradient is melting this ice. Thermal expansion and heat absorbed by open water is melting this ice from below.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">This makes for a much more variable and turbulent system. The land in the Northern hemisphere is warming, while the sea warms more slowly. Except in the North. The land and the sea are both warming there because they are the bottom of the temperature hill.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Canada and Australia have warmed twice as fast as the world as a whole, for example, They are near the bottom of their respective temperature gradients. The West of the USA has warmed at close to the Canadian rate. It is cut off from the sea by the Rocky Mountains.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Now, when you pump more heat into an unstable system, like the Northern Hemisphere, it becomes more unstable.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Think of a lot of hot air&#8211;it flows upward and pole-wards. Cold air has to flow the other way to make room. Thus, the more you heat the tropics (and the land), the more hot humid air flows northward, and the more likely the cold air is to dip southward, especially in the American and Canadian West.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">It normally does this. In a warming world, it can be counted on to do this more.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Thus, this year you have a jet stream which has dipped down as far as Florida and Arizona. There is a high pressure area over the North Atlantic which is helping to lock this dip into place. Europe is also cold because it has its own dip of the jet stream. Siberia is not that much colder than usual.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Last year was exceptionally warm. All years have been exceptionally warm for the last decade. But it has been exceptionally cold in North America. This is something that happens normally sometimes, but you can expect more of it while the world warms. The cold air and the hot air have to mix somewhere and somehow.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">In other words, you can expect more blizzards in odd places and at odd times. Warm humid air is a good way of carrying heat and water. But eventually it has to dump its heat and its water. If the place is cold enough, whumpfff! you get a massive amount of snow, or hail, or rain.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">While the global warming deniers have been clipping the charts to focus on the last ten years, claiming that it&#8217;s getting colder, and on the USA, where it IS colder than elsewhere, but not that much colder than winters were like when I was a kid, the world as a whole has continued to warm.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">It&#8217;s a kind of tunnel vision, or horse-blinkers, that horses who don&#8217;t want to be distracted by where they are going put on, so they can pretend they&#8217;re not going any where.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Last year was one of the warmest on record globally. This year is likely to be another.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">And take note: it doesn&#8217;t matter how much snow falls or ice forms in the winter if the summer melt is greater than can be replaced. You can have very cold winters or normal winters, but the ice gets thinner every year. The area may yo-yo almost up to &#8220;normal&#8221; for the last few thousand years, but it&#8217;s going, going, gone! &#8211;at least in the summer.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">We don&#8217;t have to worry about Antarctica because the bulk of its ice is protected by the sea bed, which has a sort of bowl like &#8220;lip&#8221; that keeps water from flowing under the main bulk of East Antarctica ice.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Of course, when water warms enough to melt the ice back off of this lip, it will pour into the bowl and then the East Antartica ice sheet will be threatened with unbelievably rapid collapse (over centuries, all the same).</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">This is unlikely to happen in our lifetimes, but is one big wildcard hidden in the deck for our species as a whole.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">In short, the human race is living in a fool&#8217;s paradise. The long-term effects of things we are arguing over now could really, really do a lot of damage 10,000 years from now, or for that matter in 500.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">The precautionary principle says we should be careful, even about the unknown unknowns, let alone the known unknowns, the known knowns and those rara avis, the unknown knowns, the stuff we know is true but don&#8217;t know we know is true, such as the fact that global warming deniers are completely full of BS and a lot of them know it. How many BSers know they are BSing? We don&#8217;t know. A lot. I am assuming all the people with a vested interest know that they are pursuing their vested interests, not the truth. That would be anybody with a vested interest (or mental or emotional investment) in coal, oil, natural gas, the wrong sort of bio-fuels, planes, trains and automobiles, not to mention the consumption society and mass affluence Euro- or American-style.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Well, that would be nearly all of us living in Fools&#8217; Paradise, wouldn&#8217;t it?</div>
<p>Listen up and I&#8217;ll explain:</p>
<p>Increases in the amount of greenhouse gases make the world warmer. They are called greenhouse gases because they trap heat, being transparent to sunlight coming into the atmosphere, and opaque to various wavelengths of infrared radiation emitted by matter warmed by the sunlight.</p>
<p>The atmosphere becomes more energetic, and thus more active. Heated objects expand, so does heated air and water and land.</p>
<p>Now, there is a temperature gradient from the equator to the poles because of the angle at which the sun&#8217;s rays strike the Earth.</p>
<p>The Southern hemisphere has more water and a continent at its pole. The Northern hemisphere has most of the world&#8217;s land, and a small ocean at its pole.</p>
<p>Thus the two hemispheres heat unevenly. The Northern hemisphere heats faster because it has more land and because that&#8217;s where most of the human-caused emissions occur&#8211;it&#8217;s like dumping feathers&#8211;they spread out eventually, carried by the wind or water, but first they pile up.</p>
<p>The continent of Antarctica is surrounded by a circular current of water and a circular current of air that helps to keep it cold, even as the southern hemisphere warms. It is also very high. It is the highest continent. Much of it is more than two or three miles high&#8211;because of all that ice.</p>
<p>Antarctica is a very conservative mass. Since it takes vastly more energy to melt ice than to warm air or water, it is taking a very long time to warm the high plateau of East Anarctica.</p>
<p>At the other pole, however, the ice is floating on water for the most part. Heat dumped down the temperature gradient is melting this ice. Thermal expansion and heat absorbed by open water is melting this ice from below.</p>
<p>This makes for a much more variable and turbulent system. The land in the Northern hemisphere is warming, while the sea warms more slowly. Except in the North. The land and the sea are both warming there because they are the bottom of the temperature hill.</p>
<p>Canada and Australia have warmed twice as fast as the world as a whole, for example, They are near the bottom of their respective temperature gradients. The West of the USA has warmed at close to the Canadian rate. It is cut off from the sea by the Rocky Mountains.</p>
<p>Now, when you pump more heat into an unstable system, like the Northern Hemisphere, it becomes more unstable.</p>
<p>Think of a lot of hot air&#8211;it flows upward and pole-wards. Cold air has to flow the other way to make room. Thus, the more you heat the tropics (and the land), the more hot humid air flows northward, and the more likely the cold air is to dip southward, especially in the American and Canadian West.</p>
<p>It normally does this. In a warming world, it can be counted on to do this more.</p>
<p>Thus, this year you have a jet stream which has dipped down as far as Florida and Arizona. There is a high pressure area over the North Atlantic which is helping to lock this dip into place. Europe is also cold because it has its own dip of the jet stream. Siberia is not that much colder than usual.</p>
<p>Last year was exceptionally warm. All years have been exceptionally warm for the last decade. But it has been exceptionally cold in North America. This is something that happens normally sometimes, but you can expect more of it while the world warms. The cold air and the hot air have to mix somewhere and somehow.</p>
<p>In other words, you can expect more blizzards in odd places and at odd times. Warm humid air is a good way of carrying heat and water. But eventually it has to dump its heat and its water. If the place is cold enough, whumpfff! you get a massive amount of snow, or hail, or rain.</p>
<p><a href="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/graph.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1268" title="Graphs can show anything" src="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/graph-150x150.jpg" alt="Graphs can show anything" width="150" height="150" /></a>While the global warming deniers have been clipping the charts to focus on the last ten years, claiming that it&#8217;s getting colder, and on the USA, where it IS colder than elsewhere, but not that much colder than winters were like when I was a kid, the world as a whole has continued to warm.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a kind of tunnel vision, or horse-blinkers, that horses who don&#8217;t want to be distracted by where they are going put on, so they can pretend they&#8217;re not going any where.</p>
<p>Last year was one of the warmest on record globally. This year is likely to be another.</p>
<p>And take note: it doesn&#8217;t matter how much snow falls or ice forms in the winter if the summer melt is greater than can be replaced. You can have very cold winters or normal winters, but the ice gets thinner every year. The area may yo-yo almost up to &#8220;normal&#8221; for the last few thousand years, but it&#8217;s going, going, gone! &#8211;at least in the summer.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t have to worry about Antarctica because the bulk of its ice is protected by the sea bed, which has a sort of bowl like &#8220;lip&#8221; that keeps water from flowing under the main bulk of East Antarctica ice.</p>
<p>Of course, when water warms enough to melt the ice back off of this lip, it will pour into the bowl and then the East Antartica ice sheet will be threatened with unbelievably rapid collapse (over centuries, all the same).</p>
<p>This is unlikely to happen in our lifetimes, but is one big wildcard hidden in the deck for our species as a whole.</p>
<p>In short, the human race is living in a fool&#8217;s paradise. The long-term effects of things we are arguing over now could really, really do a lot of damage 10,000 years from now, or for that matter in 500.</p>
<p>The precautionary principle says we should be careful, even about the unknown unknowns, let alone the known unknowns, the known knowns and those rara avis, the unknown knowns, the stuff we know is true but don&#8217;t know we know is true, such as the fact that global warming deniers are completely full of BS and a lot of them know it. How many BSers know they are BSing? We don&#8217;t know. A lot. I am assuming all the people with a vested interest know that they are pursuing their vested interests, not the truth. That would be anybody with a vested interest (or mental or emotional investment) in coal, oil, natural gas, the wrong sort of bio-fuels, planes, trains and automobiles, not to mention the consumption society and mass affluence Euro- or American-style.</p>
<p>Well, that would be nearly all of us living in Fools&#8217; Paradise, wouldn&#8217;t it?</p>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/personal/global-warming-listening/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ever get the feeling you&#8217;re being watched?</title>
		<link>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/feeling-watched</link>
		<comments>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/feeling-watched#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/?p=1033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bunch of almost unblinking citizens telling us how to watch our neighbourhood and report suspicious behaviour or activity that relates to terrorism. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/big-bro-watching.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1035" title="Big Brother is Watching YOU" src="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/big-bro-watching-150x150.jpg" alt="Big Brother is Watching YOU" width="150" height="150" /></a>Now if this isn&#8217;t the creepiest, most blatantly Orwelian TV ad I have ever seen&#8230; A bunch of almost unblinking citizens telling us how to watch our neighbourhood and report suspicious behaviour or activity that relates to terrorism. It&#8217;s described as &#8220;neighbourhood watch for the city&#8221;.  If you see, hear or <em>smell </em>something suspicious, report it using the phone or a convenient web site.</p>
<p>&#8220;I watch my America&#8221;. We have our <a href="http://www.ag.gov.au/agd/www/nationalsecurity.nsf/Page/The_National_Security_Hotline">own version</a> of this here in Australia but this one from the LAPD is just so blatantly creepy that it hurts. I say it is ungood, and might even go so far as to say <em>double plus</em> ungood.</p>
<p><object id="flashObj" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="486" height="412" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=45915495001&amp;playerID=6555681001&amp;domain=embed&amp;" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/6555681001?isVid=1&amp;publisherID=769341148" /><param name="name" value="flashObj" /><param name="flashvars" value="videoId=45915495001&amp;playerID=6555681001&amp;domain=embed&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="flashObj" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="486" height="412" src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/6555681001?isVid=1&amp;publisherID=769341148" name="flashObj" allowscriptaccess="always" swliveconnect="true" allowfullscreen="true" seamlesstabbing="false" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" flashvars="videoId=45915495001&amp;playerID=6555681001&amp;domain=embed&amp;" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"></embed></object></p>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/feeling-watched/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are Americans against universal healthcare?</title>
		<link>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/americans-universal-healthcare</link>
		<comments>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/americans-universal-healthcare#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/?p=982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little something I ran across this morning:
This morning I was awoken by my alarm clock powered by electricity generated by the public power monopoly regulated by the US Department of Energy. I then took a shower in the clean water provided by the municipal water utility. After that, I turned on the TV to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/obamunism.gif"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-984" title="Obamunism" src="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/obamunism-150x150.gif" alt="Obamunism" width="150" height="150" /></a>A little something I ran across this morning:</p>
<blockquote><p>This morning I was awoken by my alarm clock powered by electricity generated by the public power monopoly regulated by the <a href="http://www.energy.gov/">US Department of Energy</a>. I then took a shower in the clean water provided by the municipal water utility. After that, I turned on the TV to one of the <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/">Federal Communications Commission</a> regulated channels to see what the <a href="http://www.nws.noaa.gov/">National Weather Service</a> of the <a href="http://www.noaa.gov/">National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration</a> determined the weather was going to be like using satellites designed, built, and launched by the <a href="http://www.nasa.gov">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</a>. I watched this while eating my breakfast of <a href="http://www.usda.gov/">US Department of Agriculture</a> inspected food and taking the drugs which have been determined as safe by the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/">Food and Drug Administration</a>. At the appropriate time as regulated by the <a href="http://congress.org/">US Congress</a> and kept accurate by the <a href="http://www.nist.gov/">National Institute of Standards and Technology</a> and the <a href="http://www.usno.navy.mil/">US Naval Observatory</a>, I get into my <a href="http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> approved automobile and set out to work on the roads build by the local, state, and <a href="http://www.dot.gov/">Federal Departments of Transportation</a>, possibly stopping to purchase additional fuel of a quality level determined by the <a href="http://www.epa.gov/">Environmental Protection Agency</a>, using legal tender issued by the <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/">Federal Reserve</a> (*) bank. On the way out the door I deposit any mail I have to be sent out via the <a href="http://www.usps.com/">US Postal Service</a> and drop the kids off at the public school. After spending another day not being maimed or killed at work thanks to the workplace regulations imposed by the <a href="http://www.dol.gov/">Department of Labor</a> and the <a href="http://www.osha.gov/">Occupational Safety and Health Administration</a>, enjoying another two meals which again do not kill me because of the USDA, I drive my NHTSA car back home on the DOT roads, to my house which has not burned down in my absence because of the state and local building codes and fire marshal&#8217;s inspection, and which has not been plundered of all its valuables thanks to the local police department. I then log on to the internet which was developed by the <a href="http://www.darpa.mil/">Defense Advanced Research Projects Administration</a> and post on <a style="color: #333333; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" title="http://freerepublic.com" href="http://freerepublic.com/" target="_blank">freerepublic.com</a> and <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/">Fox News</a> forums about how SOCIALISM in medicine is BAD because the government can&#8217;t do anything right.</p></blockquote>
<p>(*) Whoever wrote this might not be aware that the Federal Reserve banking system isn&#8217;t really a government operation. It&#8217;s private.</p>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/americans-universal-healthcare/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I always get the shakes before a drop.</title>
		<link>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/entertainment/shakes-drop</link>
		<comments>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/entertainment/shakes-drop#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/?p=934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Starship Troopers isn't an action story, though there's plenty of technology and explosions. It isn't the story of a great hero, though there are plenty of heroics. It isn't a book about tedious daily routine of military life, but parts of it would make a great documentary.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/starship-troopers1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-936" title="Starship Troopers" src="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/starship-troopers1-150x150.jpg" alt="Starship Troopers" width="150" height="150" /></a><a title="Starship Troopers" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0441014100?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=twiboolis-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0441014100">Starship Troopers</a> by Robert A Heinlein is my favourite all time novel. I bought my copy in high school probably because it had the word &#8220;Troopers&#8221; on the cover, so it had to be something like Star Wars Stormtroopers, right? Ahem. Anyhow, I&#8217;ve read it at least once a year since 1984 which makes it my most well-loved and most dog-eared novel on the shelf.</p>
<p>Starship Troopers isn&#8217;t an action story, though there&#8217;s plenty of technology and explosions. It isn&#8217;t the story of a great hero, though there are plenty of heroics. It isn&#8217;t a book about tedious daily routine of military life, but parts of it would make a great documentary.  It isn&#8217;t the inspiring story of someone who overcomes and achieves all, though the central character does have his share of failures, tragedies and achievements. It isn&#8217;t a book about the government, the military, or even being a soldier though the story uses these as a framework. It&#8217;s a book about civic virtue, and what it means to be a citizen. In the book, the rights of a full Citizen (to vote, and hold public office) must be earned through voluntary Federal service and are given only to these who are honourably discharged from Federal service. I&#8217;m not going to pigeon-hole myself or paint myself into a corner by saying that I fully agree with this philosophy, but I can&#8217;t say that it&#8217;s a bad idea. Those who are willing to put their society ahead of themselves, who are willing to risk their lives for their fellow citizens have proved themselves and should be rewarded ahead of those that are not willing.</p>
<p>The central character of the story isn&#8217;t a mighty hero. Juan Rico is just an ordinary guy who, almost on a whim, decides to enlist in the service right out of high school. His story is told mostly as a collection of flashbacks to different parts of his life including childhood, high school, basic training, and OCS school up to the point where he gets command of his own group of warriors.</p>
<p>The book suffers (rightly or wrongly) from allegations of militarism, racism, sexism and fascism but I think most if not all of these allegations can be refuted when you look at it in this context: it was written in the 60s when the United States military was largely conscript, when there were still white and coloured drinking fountains and when female cadets were not allowed at the service academies. Indeed, the lead character is Filipino, the Navy not only has female officers but is <em>dominated</em> by female officers, and the government is explicitly described as a representative democracy where the only difference between those with full citizenship and those without is the right to vote and hold public office.</p>
<p>I waited for the day this would be made into a movie. I always thought <a title="Brandon Lee" href="http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/brandon-lee.jpg">Brandon Lee</a> would make a good Johnny Rico, but alas he died young. I always thought it&#8217;d make a fantastic movie if narrated in the first person and told from the single point of view in much the same way Full Metal Jacket was done, but with more voiceovers. I was so excited when I heard this movie was coming out in 1997 and I just hoped it would be done right.</p>
<p>Instead, we got an abortion of a movie which made little to no sense and wasn&#8217;t a shadow of the book. I can only live in hope that this crime against cinema will be corrected by having the movie redone at a later date, and that it will hold true to the themes and characters of the book. May God have mercy on Paul Verhoevens soul.</p>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/entertainment/shakes-drop/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hamas elected in Palestine</title>
		<link>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/hamas-elected-in-palestine</link>
		<comments>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/hamas-elected-in-palestine#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 02:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/personal/hamas-elected-in-palestine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could this have backfired any worse? One of the big reasons why the neocons wanted to go into Iraq was because it would have a domino effect where peace-loving democracy would spread throughout the Middle East. They said the moderates in Iran would overthrow the hard-line mullahs and the Israel-hating, terrorist elements would be droned [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could this have backfired any worse? One of the big reasons why the neocons wanted to go into Iraq was because it would have a domino effect where peace-loving democracy would spread throughout the Middle East. They said the moderates in Iran would overthrow the hard-line mullahs and the Israel-hating, terrorist elements would be droned out to non-existence in Palestine.</p>
<p>Nearly four years later, we now have a hard-liner elected president of Iran who is faithful to the mullahs and wants the destruction of Israel and America, and the nuclear weapons to do it. And we have Hamas now in full, elected control of Palestine.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Iraq is still occupied by American and other forces with more than a trillion dollars spent and no end in sight.</p>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brian.hoover.net.au/blog/current-events/hamas-elected-in-palestine/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
